In a blistering 1970 interview in Beirut, a Palestinian author and politician dismantled the Western obsession with "peace talks" in one of the most incisive critiques of colonial diplomacy ever recorded. The exchange—now hauntingly prescient—reveals why oppressed peoples reject the language of compromise when their very existence is at stake.
Interviewer: "Why won't your organization engage in peace talks with the Israelis?"
Palestinian Leader: "You don’t mean exactly peace talks. You mean capitulation. Surrendering."
With this opening salvo, he exposed the hypocrisy of demanding "dialogue" from a people under occupation. The interviewer, wedded to liberal fantasies of conflict resolution, kept circling back to the same question: Why not just talk?
But the Palestinian’s responses cut to the bone:
The most damning moment came when the interviewer argued:
"Well, better [submission] than death, though."
The Palestinian’s reply should echo across every generation:
"Maybe to you but to us it is not. To us, to liberate our country, to have dignity, to have respect, to have our mere human rights is something as essential as life itself."
Here, he exposed the racist core of "peace" rhetoric: That the oppressed should prefer survival over justice, that chains are nobler than resistance.
"This interview is 54 years old. The world still asks Palestinians to surrender. Their answer remains the same."